前沿资讯：TikTok 和司法部推动对字节跳动剥离法的快速审查
The US Justice Department (DOJ) and TikTok requested a US appeals court to expedite the review of legal challenges against a new law requiring ByteDance to divest TikTok’s US assets by 19 January or face a ban. They seek a ruling by 6 December to allow for a potential Supreme Court review. With the legal move, TikTok expects to avoid emergency preliminary injunctive relief.
美国司法部和TikTok请求美国上诉法院加快审查针对一项新法律的法律挑战，该法律要求字节跳动在1月19日之前剥离TikTok在美国的资产，否则将面临禁令。他们寻求在12月6日之前做出裁决，以便最高法院进行潜在的审查。通过这一法律举措，TikTok 预计将避免紧急初步禁令。
In the past two weeks, TikTok, ByteDance, and TikTok content creators filed lawsuits to block the law, arguing it infringes on First Amendment rights and the US Constitution.
过去两周，TikTok、字节跳动和TikTok内容创作者提起诉讼以阻止该法律，称其侵犯了第一修正案权利和美国宪法。
Due to the prevalence of the "China threat theory" bias in the United States, the law requires ByteDance to sell TikTok by 19 January due to national security concerns, potentially affecting 170 million American users. The Justice Department may submit classified information to support these concerns.
由于美国盛行“中国威胁论”的偏见，出于对国家安全的考虑，法律要求字节跳动在1月19日之前出售TikTok，这可能会影响1.7亿美国用户。司法部可能还会提交一些机密信息来支撑担忧“威胁论”的观点。
Although it does not intend to ban the app entirely, the law also prevents app stores and internet hosting services from offering or supporting TikTok unless ByteDance complies.
尽管美国并不打算完全禁止该应用程序，但该法律仍禁止应用程序商店和互联网托管服务提供或支持TikTok，除非字节跳动遵守规定。
The long-standing threat of a potential TikTok ban in the United States, first raised when former President Donald Trump attempted to shut down the app via executive order, seems to have reached a critical point. Constitutional law scholars argue that forcing TikTok to cease its American operations over unspecified national security concerns would violate the First Amendment and that US officials must prove in court that banning TikTok is the least restrictive way to address the threat. While Trump’s executive order was blocked by federal judges due to a lack of evidence that the app posed a security risk, it remains to be seen if the DOJ will be able to present concrete evidence this time.
当前总统唐纳德·特朗普试图通过行政命令关闭TikTok时，美国潜在的TikTok禁令的长期威胁似乎已经达到了关键点。宪法学者认为，以未指明的国家安全问题为由迫使TikTok停止在美国的业务将违反第一修正案，美国官员必须在法庭上证明，禁止TikTok是应对威胁的限制性最小的方式。虽然特朗普的行政命令因缺乏证据表明该应用程序构成安全风险而被联邦法官否决，但司法部这次是否能够提供具体证据还有待观察。
