行业英语 学英语,练听力,上听力课堂! 注册 登录
> 行业英语 > 金融英语 > 金融时报原文阅读 >  第350篇

怎样让孩子赢在起点?

所属教程:金融时报原文阅读

浏览:

2020年07月23日

手机版
扫描二维码方便学习和分享

怎样让孩子赢在起点?

“不让孩子输在起跑线上”的概念在世界各地都有市场,中产阶级父母总是对孩子抱有很高期望,努力给他们提供各种优越条件。帮助父母进行早教,是不多见的能得到左右翼人士一致支持的议题。诺贝尔经济学奖得主詹姆斯·赫克曼指出,对早期教育投资的回报率是很高的——不仅对家长,对整个社会也是如此——但,早教并不等于认字母背单词。

测试中可能遇到的词汇和知识:

Kate Middleton 凯特王妃

executive suite 行政套房,商务套房

enthused about 对...热心

genes 基因

foetus ['fiːtəs]胎儿

godforsaken 倒霉的,凄凉的

flashcard 教孩子用的抽认卡

neuroscience 神经系统科学

阅读即将开始,建议您计算一下阅读整篇文章所用时间,并对照我们在文章最后给出的参考值来估算您的阅读速度。

Simon Kuper on how to raise a winning child

By Simon Kuper

There are a few simple things new parents could be told: speak to your child, read to it, sing to it

* * *

When Kate Middleton first holds her baby, she may feel what most new parents feel: “This child has unlimited potential. It can be anything it wants.”

But the feeling deceives. In fact, a person’s fate is already largely decided before birth. If the mother ate badly during pregnancy, or drank or smoked a lot, the kid probably won’t make the executive suite. More still is decided before age three. By then, the average American child of college-educated parents knows about 1,200 words, according to Harvard’s Center on the Developing Child. The average child of parents on welfare knows 400. The gap rarely closes after that. Life is unfair from the start.

Happily, though, something can be done. Wonks worldwide are getting excited about something called “early childhood development”. It’s a rare thrilling new idea that appeals to both right and left. It’s a set of policies that can give a Pakistani peasant baby an only somewhat worse start in life than Britain’s future monarch. (Declaration of interest: I’ve become so enthused about early childhood development that I’ve helped promote it as a sub-board member of George Soros’s Open Society Foundations.)

A lot of these policies aim at teaching parents. The primary influence on a child’s life is parenting, concluded the US’s National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in a mega-study in 2006. Parenting probably outweighs genes, money and school – and it may matter most before the child turns three.

The middle classes sense this. That’s why they treat pregnancy and child rearing as independent research projects. They read parenting books, do pregnancy yoga, and quarrel on chat sites about whether eating sushi harms the foetus. Middle-class parents like me can be found, exhausted, at half past bedtime, reading the evening’s third story about some godforsaken rabbit who won’t go to sleep, because we’re trying to shape our children’s brains.

Some poor parents do this. I knew a black maid in apartheid South Africa who raised her grandchildren almost single-handed, five hours from her employers’ house, and got them reading books. Several graduated from university.

However, few poor people study parenting in the obsessive middle-class way. Anyway, they usually lack time and resources. Raising children even in a two-parent middle-class family is exhausting. If I were a poor single parent of toddlers who woke me at 5am, I’d stick the TV on for hours.

Early-childhood advocates aim to help parents like these. Almost all parents want the best for their children; for instance, in a large survey by London University’s Institute of Education, 97 per cent of British mothers of children born from 2000 through 2002 said they wanted their child to go to university. Yet many have no idea how to do it. There are a few simple things new parents could be told: speak to your child a lot. Read to it, sing to it, sit on the floor when you play with it, feed it healthy stuff. Don’t smack it, because violence shapes the young child’s brain. Not all parents know these things, which is why some British kids start school unable to say “cat”. This advice could be delivered through health services, which typically deal with new mothers anyway.

And society can make bigger interventions: for instance, ensuring that mother and baby eat properly. That will develop the child’s brain, allowing him to learn at school, argues Bill Gates. Society can also send kids to preschool – not in order to study flashcards, but to learn life skills like concentration and dealing with others. James Heckman, the Nobel-winning Chicago economist, says these skills will help the child learn, and tend to translate into everything from larger incomes to avoiding jail.

. . .

For now, most societies still neglect the first three years. “California inspects cemeteries more often than childcare facilities”, notes The Raising of America, California Newsreel’s forthcoming documentary series about early childhood.

Yet investment in early childhood is growing. Advocates like Heckman argue that spending on these years has the highest return on investment. Shaping a baby is easier than saving a delinquent teenager or unemployed adult. Preschools, according to this logic, pay off more than welfare, prisons or even universities. Recent neuroscience – which suggests the brain is most malleable before age three – backs this up. The neuroscience often persuades people who dismiss sociology as leftist claptrap.

In short, early-childhood development appeals both to the left (which hates inequality) and to the right (which hates unproductive adults). Now countries from China to Brazil are expanding preschool. Barack Obama, in February’s State of the Union address, called for universal preschool in the US, saying: “In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children … studies show students grow up more likely to … graduate high school, hold a job, form more stable families of their own. We know this works.”

Hillary Clinton, bookmakers’ favourite to succeed Obama, just launched an initiative promoting early-childhood education. It’s called, wonderfully, “Too Small To Fail”. In an age of mostly bare policy agendas, this topic isn’t going to go away.

请根据你所读到的文章内容,完成以下自测题目:

1. According to the writer, what is probably the most important factor that decides a child's future?

a. Parenting.

b. Genes.

c. Family wealth level.

d. Family social status.

 

2. Middle classes "treat pregnancy and child rearing as independent research projects", what is the best explanation?

a. It's quite costly.

b. It's quite exhausting.

c. It requires a lot of patience.

d. They read, do experiments, and argue about it.

 

3. What should the society do to ameliorate early education, according to the article?

a. Ensure that mother and baby eat well.

b. Educating parents.

c. Expand preschooling.

d. All of above.

 

4. Why early-childhood development appeals both to the left and the right?

a. Because China and Brazil are doing this.

b. Because both sides believe that a child has unlimited potential.

c. Because it pays off better than welfare and prisons.

d. Because it has neuroscience foundations.

 

[1] 答案a. Parenting.

解释:第四段两次强调这一结论:The primary influence on a child’s life is parenting...Parenting probably outweighs genes, money and school.

[2] 答案d. They read, do experiments, and argue about it.

解释:显然只有D概括了各个方面。

[3] 答案d. All of above.

解释:注意,文章一直在讲society该做什么,比如讲了索罗斯基金会的项目到比尔盖茨的建议,和希拉里发起的“Too Small To Fail”。这些事情很大程度上是由民间组织和民营机构来做的。

[4] 答案c. Because it pays off better than welfare and prisons.

解释:作者认为B“the feeling deceives”,AD不是两派人士达成共识的原因。作者在倒数第二段总结了,左派人士憎恶“起点不平等”,右派人士憎恶成年人缺乏自食其力能力,需要依赖福利。而早教项目恰巧能让他们同时满意。


用户搜索

疯狂英语 英语语法 新概念英语 走遍美国 四级听力 英语音标 英语入门 发音 美语 四级 新东方 七年级 赖世雄 zero是什么意思福州市斗门新村英语学习交流群

网站推荐

英语翻译英语应急口语8000句听歌学英语英语学习方法

  • 频道推荐
  • |
  • 全站推荐
  • 推荐下载
  • 网站推荐